"Stuffed-shirt snob-ass" would probably be a more accurate way of describing me, as opposed to "hillaryesque".
Sell and split if I don't like the territory. Hmmm. Well, for that to happen, I would have to actually own it, which if you had read correctly you would see that I don't. (and won't). So the second option would be to split, and Im not going to do that either, quite simply, because I don't have to. I don't have to watch my investments like a boiling pot to make money off of them, because I do not invest in manipulated POS stocks, hence the reason I don't own it.
I had not planned on posting here again, but with a reaction like yours, I see that there is probably reason. No one would have had such a defensive reaction to someone who really didn't post anything specific to this stock if there weren't something to defend. Now you have my curiosity, why are you so defensive??? You probably should have just kept your mouth shut.
You hit the nail on the head when you used the term "manipulated into buying in"; the only thing is, I wasn't. I know better. But, if that is how this company attracts investors, that is more the reason NOT to buy. I bet they really appreciate your post...NOT. Again, you should have just kept your mouth shut; you are tipping your (or their) hand.
Binder |