SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gary105 who wrote (3446)11/21/1999 10:46:00 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) of 5102
 
2a. any thoughts on msft using inpr as backdoor linux entry?

I'm not sure why the term "backdoor"... A significant aspect of Linux popularity will be the availability of the powerful tools we now have under Windows.

To date, no one (I repeat NO ONE) makes tools of the caliber Borland (now Inprise) does. Period. In addition, as someone who has followed this company for years, I can point to Microsoft's unfair practices as the principal reason for Borland's recent problems. If you look back to the days of Paradox and Quattro Pro, you see the better products (Borland's) defeated by the unfair price competition -- where MSFT was allowed to sell its competing products for below their costs in order to drive Borland out (they were successful). In the Linux marketplace, it does not appear at this time that a similar threat exists.

So, I take issue with the term "Backdoor". I think the manufacturers of these kinds of software tools will drive Linux, not merely tag along.

Don't know about item (1) of your question, but my recollection is that MSFT took no stake in INPR -- they simply purchased the rights to Borland's patent for technique used in BCB and Delphi of allowing the editing of forms as plain text and maybe some lesser stuff.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext