SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 256.41+1.1%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (33309)11/22/1999 9:51:00 AM
From: Katherine Derbyshire  Read Replies (2) of 70976
 
It's extraordinarily difficult for any company, no matter how well-managed, to deal with a change that renders its products obsolete. Lester Thurow uses the example of GE: they independently invented the transistor at about the same time AT&T did, but they gave it to the vacuum tube division.

For a more recent example, how many of the big traditional retailers and print publishers have become Internet powerhouses? By my count, the answer is *zero.* (In fairness, the Internet battle isn't over yet, though.)

To my knowledge, neither INTC, MSFT, nor AMAT has previously faced a challenge as radical as the transistor was, as the Internet is, or as a post-silicon technology would be. IMO, the jury is still very much out regarding how well INTC will handle the post-PC era or how well MSFT will handle the Internet era. Since most of the post-silicon technologies I have seen are radically different from *anything* AMAT is currently doing, I have my doubts about their ability to make the jump, too.

Katherine
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext