SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (42541)11/23/1999 10:36:00 AM
From: jpmac  Read Replies (1) of 71178
 
I understood (I think) Coug's reaction, and it was a case of pointing out intent and style. If something is charged for us, we can miss satire.

And I'm not sure anything is too serious to joke about. I'm generally irreverant. But the notion that humor is always good-humor is false. As satire can be used to expose our foibles and society's shortcomings, etc... it can be used to be cruel, not funny. How often does someone say something terribly mean and then say "I was only joking"? They weren't. They were dressing a cruel barb in humor, but the intent was the cruel part.

And with humor, there are lines, intent, and timing. Timing can be very important.

I grew up in a sarcastic family. In verbal battles that can be useful and I do like the genre. However, I used it unwisely in personal interactions. When discussion and honest exchange would heal, I threw out sarcastic barbs. It was difficult to unlearn that and to use it as an artform with a purpose, in its place and time.

Sometimes we miss it due to moving to quickly, sometimes due to a closeness to the subject. I think one of those probably the case with Coug, so no big deal.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext