SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Official Payments Corp. (OPAY)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Glenn Petersen who wrote ()11/23/1999 11:03:00 AM
From: Dr. Diligence  Read Replies (1) of 50
 
Repost from Ragingbull IPO board. -- On a risk/reward basis, it?s better and safer to play some parent companies of upcoming IPOs.

NETA is a parent company of McAFee (MCAF). DZTK is a parent company of PFSWeb.(PFSW).

A much better one is IMP, which is the parent holding company of OPAY. Also mentioned at Ragingbull IPO editorial [ ragingbull.com ]Unlike other parent companies, IMP has attracted little attention so far and rendered it a much safer play.

But there is always a risk of general market decline. So if you enter a long position, better to buy a few puts for protection. IMO, financial companies that have been at record level would decline more in a general market downturn before Y2K. I myself bought some puts on Citigroup a few days ago, but I chose some out of money options so they don?t move that much.

I have watched HCNS went up with RETK; GIC up with NXTV [ ragingbull.com ]; VOCL up with ITXC; and this time again, due diligence should pay off. Recently, I have been right on TZIX [ ragingbull.com ], APLN [ ragingbull.com ], HUM, Interest Rate [ ragingbull.com ], and some other things and I think I have spent adequate due diligence, out of my limited time, on IMP.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext