Rickmas: You seem to have joined the recent trend of DCHT promoters who flog the stock on threads other than its own. At least there is some excuse on Yahoo, which won't allow the likes of DCHT to have its own thread, but that isn't the case on SI.
Your review of DCHT left off a few relevant facts. For example, the company is run by proven liars. I presume you are well aware of the Antaeus scam, dating back to February when DCHT announced a big order that didn't really exist from a customer that didn't really exist in any meaningful sense either. More recently it announced a contract that it headlined to be $2.4 million, which included all contract options and extensions that may never be exercised rather than the real amount, possibly very tiny, that the customer actually agreed to buy.
Most important, you neglected to mention the company desperate financial straits, as revealed by its most recent 10-Q. This includes evidence that it hasn't paid its suppliers all year, as I noted in a recent post on the DCHT thread here.
Your post talks about DCHT's sensors, but it sells pitiable few of them, and loses lots of money doing so. What it mainly sells is shares of its own stock, which explains management's constant appearances at conferences and exhibitions, ostensibly to "educate" the public. I think that investors in that stock will end up with a pretty good education all right, but it may not be what they expected.
I expect to see the usual spewing post or posts from Oshinsky within a few hours, which everyone can ignore, but I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on these matters, over on the DCHT thread where it belongs. |
