SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 478.53-1.0%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John F. Dowd who wrote (34720)11/24/1999 3:28:00 PM
From: nommedeguerre  Read Replies (2) of 74651
 
John,

"The point that is being made is that IBM, a then much larger company, was a direct software competitor of MSFT and certainly had their own built in alternative and was a direct competitor of MSFT in the O/S software market. "

This still does not explain how selling licenses of Windows will hurt MSFT. It would boost IBM's HARDWARE sales, an area in which Microsoft definitely does not compete directly; how does shipping a PC with Windows boost the sale of any other OS? That is Microsoft's whole strategy: lock the end-user into Windows regardless of platform. This is why they are paying people to put WinCE on everything.

IBM is hardly a bad credit risk. What did they owe 10's of millions for? I don't remember. Businesses this large usually fail to pay for contractual reasons (i.e. Microsoft failed to live up to a contractual agreement hence the contractual payment was not made. This is the way corporations operate, has nothing to do with the inability to pay.).

The processors in the IBM PC's are Intel or Intel-licensed compatibles yet IBM makes the PowerPC and other processors. Does IBM pay more per processor to AMD or whomever simply because they are a competitor in the processor market?

Would Firestone refuse to sell Ford tires simply because Ford owned Pirelli?

Cheers,

Norm
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext