SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (55437)11/26/1999 12:14:00 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (2) of 95453
 
OSX versus E&Ps -- Another View

There is no question that the E&Ps are much cheaper than the OSX based on the short-term earnings outlook for these groupings. But that is not the whole story.

Everybody in the energy industry "knows' that current crude oil quotes in the $26-27 range will not last much longer. A drop back to the low 20s is just a matter of time. So the E&P earnings probably are at or near a peak RIGHT NOW. And peak earnings usually do not get high multiples (tech stocks excepted)

OSX earnings -- while depressed right now -- will rise much higher over the next 2 years, although there is wide disagreement over the pace of improvement. And this is so even if crude drops back to the low 20s. Bottom line -- the OSX is just beginning a major cyclical rise in earnings while the E&Ps are at or near a peak right now.

Stock attraction can also be gauged by comparing current quotes to previous cyclical peaks. And the OSX comes off much better by this measure than either integrated oil companies or most E&Ps.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext