SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
QCOM 170.95-4.5%12:27 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bux who wrote (3647)11/26/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: engineer  Read Replies (3) of 13582
 
BUX,

It is more economic that anything here. You can stack microcells in TDMA, but like you say it is quite tricky. the big problem is that once you bisect a cell, you have to turn it's power down so that the adjacent cells cannot see you or interfere with you. Once you have done this, then you must fill back in the holes you created. If you have ever seen the reuse pattern for a K=7 (i.e. frequency can be reused every 7th cell), then you can see that once you put the first one in you have to put in like 28 cells to build the coverage back up. Unless BTS equipment got real cheap lately, this means for every double in capacity you have to spend 20-30 times in equipment. I do not think that wiht AT&T already at an economic disadvantage of 4:1 they need to go out and make that 28:1.

Basic answer....you can't get there from here and if Armstrong has market guys running his show rather than engineering econ people, he will be swept out faster than his predecessor...

I can't wait for the tracking stock to roll out, because they will have to raise $5B just to try to get back to even. It would be MUCH better to swallow his ego a little, spend $5B on a CDMA upgrade everywhere (via OVERLAY using LUCENT equipment) and cut his losses. But corporate face can be a terrible thing to overcome. Look at ERICY.....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext