SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Jesus

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Berry Picker who wrote (2436)11/26/1999 11:15:00 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 4775
 
Minor note: The verse in Hebrews says "fornicator, OR profane person" not "fornicator AND profane person. I think Esau was used as an example of a profane person not a "fornicator" or a "profane fornicator" as you styled him.

On the hatred business, yes, I do think it is impossible to hate someone and love them at the same time. At least I think so. I can't think of anyone I actually hate right now though. I dislike plenty of people and get angry at people occasionally. Some of the people I've been really angry at I probably hated for a short time but that passes.

And I think the idea that people should love their enemies and hate their enemies simultaneously (and ditto for unbelieving family members) to be just double talk. I wonder if the fact that you chose to put quotes around the love command but not around hate is significant?

Luke 14:26 doesn't say "hate your relatives if they are unbelievers". It says to hate your relatives PERIOD or you can't be a follower of Jesus. Now I don't believe people should hate their families, but should love them. Thus I'd say the "hate" commanded is not meant literally but is hyperbole. Given that, I think people should question whether other uses of the word hate may not be meant literally either.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext