SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 91.18-4.3%Nov 17 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (35265)11/27/1999 1:28:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Carl, <But this is a subject near and dear to my heart, so I am happy to expound on it.>

So you're a graphics controller kind of guy?

Despite all the barbs, I appreciate your point-of-view. (Except for the "dead dead dead" comment, of course. ;-) I'm working on server chipsets, which can be vastly different from graphics controllers.

<We should note that Nintendo chose embedded DRAM for its next graphics controller. The previous version used the older variety of RDRAM. my calculations above will illustrate just why that design win went to embedded. Simply put, RDRAM is scaling to a size too big for that market.>

Interestingly, Sony decided to solve that problem by going with dual RDRAM channels and putting one 128 Mbit chip on each channel. Seems like Nintendo is taking a step beyond that with embedded DRAM.

However, I don't think Nintendo's move to embedded DRAM is a negative for RDRAM. Embedded DRAM is a totally different technology, and it is aimed at different market needs than conventional (non-embedded) DRAM. And the RDRAM question centers around conventional DRAM, not embedded.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext