SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 478.53-1.0%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (34890)11/28/1999 2:43:00 PM
From: Bill Fischofer  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Re: The appellate process

While it is true that the DoJ and Judge Jackson can request that any appeal go directly to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court is under no obligation to accept such an expedited process and can remand the case back to the Appellate level or accept it for direct consideration at their sole discretion.

Given the gravity of the case and the conservative nature of the judicial system, my guess is that the Supreme Court would wish to see due process given full latitude here. Clearly the case will wind up at the Supreme Court eventually should the two sides find themselves unable to reach a compromise, but attempting to short-circuit the judicial process seems dangerous and foolhardy and one unlikely to be sanctioned by the Supreme Court except in the most extraordinary of circumstance and for the most compelling reasons. I cannot imagine how the nation would stand imperiled by the normal process here so I have a hard time imagining how DoJ could make its case for circumvention even if that is a theoretical option.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext