VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rich Wolf who wrote (16486)	11/30/1999 1:55:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) of 27311

Sorry Rich, I have to disagree. Success at this juncture is absolutely irrelevant to whether VLNC fraudulently misled investors by announcing a $100 million contract with MOT in 1993. <<Larry, Larry, Larry, ... Yes, you are no lawyer.>> Yes, Rich, I am no lawyer. But you should really give some thought to what you are saying before you ridicule somebody else. Because you just claimed the plaintiffs must prove "beyond doubt that the company knew beyond a doubt that there would be problems after the signing of the initial Motorola contract." If you knew anything about the law whatsoever, you would know that plaintiffs in a civil case only have to prove their case with a preponderance of the evidence, not "beyond a doubt." You sir, are certainly no lawyer.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next