SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Process Boy who wrote (81516)11/30/1999 2:10:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (3) of 1572372
 
PB,

<And yes my latest rebuttal to Charles. All's I'm going to say is that he is absolutely wrong on his binsplit information. Wrong ,wrong, wrong. His source is nowhere near Coppermine. That is very apparent. I do take exception with Charles indicating he has an inside source on Coppermine issues, and then post a bunch of inaccurate crap.>

Pretty strong language coming from you! I said this about CuMine bin splits - The current binsplits at 800MHz are non existant and it needs an additional stepping to get 800s in to production and it will take Feb/March time frame to get volumes on that speed grade. Do you deny this? I asked you this before and I don't remeber seeing a yes or no. You were pretty quick to point out 733 yields were in double digits so why are you hesitating on something like this? If you say I am wrong on this count, i will shut up and wait for 800 volumes to show up in sooner than Feb.

<This guy can't even get the proper state that the design group is located in for Pete's sake. >

I am not sure if you are knocking my sources but I thought Katmai/CuMine circuit designs were done in Folsom and asked you to confirm. This partciluar info is not from a "source". This was based on my impressions on a lot of conversations I have had with people over the last few months. To be sure the confidence level on that peice of information shows up in my original statement in this regard - which was - "If I am not mistaken, the Wilamette guys are in Oregon and the CuMine guys are in Folsom."

<Why doesn't this guy, if he is so down on INTC, (and apparently at least thinking he's/she's violating his/her NDA) even work there? >

Man, don't go about talking about NDAs. Everyone talks - intentionally or unintentionally - either out of pleasure or out of pain. People/companies only complain when the info is not favorable to them. Just look at this thread and see what gets posted - don't need to look too far to reach that conclusion.

<You got out, didn't you? Why doesn't this unhappy INTC camper? That's what's cool about the U.S., employment is an implied 2 way contract. >

Acutally one of the guys who commented on the bin splits is in fact looking outside and I do not believe he is alone in thinking of getting out. In this day and age, lots of smart people leave companies which they thing are slowing down.
(look at Greg Favor, he left AMD a year back or so and now he is a multi-millionaire thanks to Siara)

<And working sror someone that you go around stabbing in the back, >

How can it be stabbing if this guys are obvioulsy feeding me crap? There is not much of ethics involved here. Companies routniely don't tell bad news to stockholders until it is too late. Compeition/customers hear about bad news way before it starts leaking out on public forums and insiders dump their shares way before too. Just remember not everone needs to tow the party line.

Just that some is not happy with how his company is performing and vents doesn't mean the guy is unethical.
If it is unethical share bad news is it OK to share good news?

Chuck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext