Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 168.08

+1.8%

Nov 28 12:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: limtex who wrote (52028)	11/30/1999 8:06:00 PM
From: 100cfm	Read Replies (1) of 152472

L you have it exactly right. you are a perfect example, you can't get dsl, so what would you rather have, cisco's fixed internet access or Q's mobile wireless for the same money that you use on the road, in the office or at home. i don't see where there's even a question which one people would prefer. once the pdq is slimmed down and it can run microsoft applications,and is bluetooth enabled, why would you go with anything else. Q will offer the best of all worlds in a portable device. the only concern i would have is that i would not like to see cisco beat us to market. i would like to see hdr out first. but as another poster has said cisco can't just add water and have a complete wireless infrastructure in place. so i don't think we have much to worry about. and i'll keep saying it, you don't give away a technology if it's killer, cisco knows it's not thats why it's free. also always remember the words that one of the jacobs used (can't remember if it was dr. j or paul) but one of them said that cisco would be a customer not a competitor. if they don't view them as competition then niether should we. 100

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next