Edwarda, here is a copy of a post I sent someone this week. I am commenting on JLAs (and others') assumption that someone from here "turned him in". I don't believe anybody turned him in, I think SI watches him. So, his attacks on misc. individuals regarding this matter (imo) are completely unjustified. There isn't any excuse for his behavior, he just makes up something to justify himself.
I think SI watches JLA without any interference from anybody else. You know why I think that? Because when I was suspended I found something out by accident. I found out that when you return after being suspended, they read your private messages. I don't know if they always do it or just on the Clinton threads, or what. If you recall I pm'd you after I was suspended that one time and all I said was, "I'm disappointed", etc. I found out later, in a totally unrelated way, that SI had read some of those posts (I didn't know it at the time). When JLA was suspended, however, he came back spewing his usual venom and who knows what the hell was in his PMs. But if you recall, he was pretty shaken up when he returned and discovered someone was reading the thread, etc. wasn't he? He started posting to neo that he was sending him emails, etc. THAT is what did him in. So now, whenever anybody posts to SI to remove a post from JLA (which is normally just routine housekeeping), they just suspend him, especially if its over a holiday when they can't watch him. Thats what I think. |
