SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dialogic ready to soar, funds buying

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey L. Henken who wrote (271)4/17/1997 8:30:00 PM
From: Jay M. Harris   of 674
 
OK DLGC sports fans Q1 97 EPS Review :-(
Financials:Revenues for the quarter were $57.1 million up 17% YOY and
off 5% from the $60 million Wall Street was modeling. The 5% revenue
shortfall in the quarter came from slow domestic sales which were up
only 8% YOY and down 5 million or 13% from q4. International revenues
were strong (50% of total) up 40% YOY. Europe grew 27% while asia grew
at 53%. Gross Profit was 35.2 million or 61.9% of revenue. R&D was
12.3 million or 21.5% of revenue; SG&A 18.3 mil or 32.2% of revenue.
Operating income was 4.7 mil or 8.2% of revenue. This was down from 13.6%
of revenue last year and is the poorest performance in the company's
history as a public company. Interest income was $350,000. Net income
was 3.2 mil or $.20 per share down from eps of $.30 in last years same
quarter. As a reminder this quarter is usually DLGC's slowest quarter
seasonally. High density products (more than 8 ports) was 60% of revenue
while low density was 40%. Low density ports shipped were the culprit
here and were down YOY while high density products exhibited 50% growth
YOY. Top 10 clients represented 24% of revenue and the top 50 clients
represented 50% of quarterly revenue. DSO's increased to 56 days due
to a higher % of Intl with longer payment terms as well as a higher
% of high density revenue with longer terms. The quarter was not back
end loaded.

The company is evaluating their approach to seek better balance between
short term and long term shareholder interests. They are
re-prioritizing projects and initiatives to build a more variable
approach with the goal of investing for the future while maintaining
expenses in line with revenues.

Howard Bubb's Review of Operations: The performance advantages of the
Dual Span; Anteries; and CP12 fax products are continuing to win large
complex network systems. The new low end product line introduced in 1996
has been very successful in taking back market share from the clones.
Port shipments of low end products are up but revenue was down due to
price reductions and higher volume discounts with major customers. They
have achieved their goal as the low cost producer and have proven their
willingness and ability to win against the clones. Their inquiries to
date have indicated no design losses among new or existing customers.
Further their customers have not reported any significant project losses
with end users. Dialogic delivers Just in Time to their clients and
carries little firm order back log. They believe this is a valuable
service to their customers and avoides fluctuations due to channel
inventory but it limits DLGC's visibility.

John Alfiery VP Sales Americas: He is NOT pleased with Q1 revenue results.
He is quite excited about the new design wins in several application
areas involving complex;large; multable technology sales in customer
accounts. He believes with the high density business up over 50% that
this is a positive indicator that DLGC's business is strong. New design
wins include: enhanced services;voice activated dialing;call back; debit
card, and wireless messaging. These applications can be quite complex
and require very sophisticated support.

Several specific causes for the revenue shortfall:Timing and forcast
related issues with a number of customers. During q1 a number of long
standing customers did not achieve the revenue # that DLGC had been
forcasting for them for q1. This is an issue of predictability of
forcasting client revenue. The sales forcasting process tracks the top
200 clients which represent 75% of DLGC's business in the Americas by
revenue by region. This process is based on the clients ability to
predict their own business. As of now they believe that their clients
business is all right,but in Q1 they did not take the amount of product
that DLGC had anticipated. The clients have indicated that their business
with DLGC remains strong,and that they have a strong backlog for the
remainder of 1997. The timing related issues were related to a large
# of clients of varying sizes. An example is ICS who was in the process
of rolling out a very large deployment to MCI.To date this is the largest
deployment to a telco or PTT in the world totaling about 50,000 voice
ports. DLGC and ICS anticipated a large shipment in q1 in the amount of
$750,000. During q1 ICS indicated to DLGC that this order would be
delayed until Q4 1997. This single order change alone amounted to 25%
of the 3 million shortfall in the Americas. Another reason for the Q1
shortfall can be attributed to the slower than expected volume revenue
increase associated with new design wins. These are new clients where
DLGC has a design win and the client is in the process of designing
DLGC SCSA products into their product offerings. This is a 4 stage
process. #1) The decision to go with DLGC or the closure of the design
win #2)The actual customer developement process. #3)The launch of the
product by the DLGC client and starting the ramp up of volume production
shipments to the end user. #4)The actual volume attainment of shipments
of the client product to respective end users. The problem in Q1 is that
the company met plan with new design wins or stage #1. However, the new
clients have taken longer than DLGC would have liked in the subsequent
stages. Another example was that Brite Voice Systems ran into technological
challenges associated with implementations of DLGC's latest technology.
This has caused a delay in the volume shipments. He closed by saying
that his entire sales organization in the Americas is committed to
achieving DLGC's ORIGIONAL revenue targets over the remainder of 97.

Howard Bubb: Stated that DLGC is becomming more conservative regarding
the 1997 revenue plan because of the slow start to 97;possibility of
further price erosion at the low end, and the ramp up risk in Spectrons
Texas Instraments DSP Bios Program. They are trimming internal revenue
estimates by about 5 to 6 million for the remainder of 97. They have
initiated expense containment actions to protect EPS as much as possible
consistant with the strategy to maximize growth of earnings for the long
term. They are also pursuing 3 to 4 major new opportunities at this time
with strategic partners. These would carry significant committed
incremental revenue for 98,99, and 2000. If they win these designs, they
will be making investments in R&D outside the normal operating plan for 97.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext