SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 493.80-2.7%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stormweaver who wrote (34999)12/1/1999 8:18:00 PM
From: PMS Witch  Read Replies (3) of 74651
 
...will people upgrade their win95/98/NT boxes to 2000...

I only see two reasons to upgrade: W2000 has some 'gotta have' features; Win98 has some 'gotta get away from' flaws. I'm sure everyone has a 'wish list' for their OS. How well Microsoft gauges the public's appetites will determine the upgrade penetration.

However, let's not forget that new PCs need OSs too, and that few people buy today's hardware with yesterday's software if given a choice.

I'm probably in a minority here, but I'd rather see Windows trying to accomplish less but execute more reliably. The thrill of a new feature wears off very quickly when work stops because of yet another malfunction. I hope W2000 proves to be a stable OS. I'd rather wait a while longer and load a debugged product. In the long run, the repeated promise of reliability must be delivered or credibility is sacrificed.

However, I'm aware that Microsoft gets the blame when things go wrong, their fault or not. Today's PC is much more complex than just a few years ago. Not all drivers are from Microsoft. Microsoft didn't write my BIOS. Each vendor adds their stuff to the pot too and not all developers follow guidelines.

Cheers, PW
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext