SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Neurobiological Tech (NTII)
NTII 0.00010000.0%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cacaito who wrote (728)12/3/1999 8:05:00 AM
From: Dr. John M. de Castro  Read Replies (1) of 1494
 
Behavioral effects and anticonvulsant efficacies of low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA antagonists in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999 Oct 4;146(3):280-289, Geter-Douglass B, Witkin JM, Drug Development Group, NIDA Addiction Research Center, NIH, 5500 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA

Rationale: It has been hypothesized that low-affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists may have therapeutic efficacy (e.g., in epilepsy, stroke, drug dependence) without the adverse side effects associated with high-affinity ligands (e.g., dizocilpine, phencyclidine). Objectives: To determine whether low-affinity NMDA antagonists have a larger predicted therapeutic window than high-affinity ligands. Methods: In Swiss-Webster mice, we compared the effects of uncompetitive antagonists having a range of affinities for the NMDA receptor ion channel [dizocilpine, memantine, ibogaine, amantadine and 5-aminocarbonyl-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenzo[a,d] cyclohepten-5,10-imine (ADCI)] in three behavioral assays typically used to assess NMDA receptor antagonism. Behavioral side effects were compared with the efficacy of the compounds to protect against NMDA-induced seizures. Results: Only dizocilpine and memantine substituted fully in mice trained to discriminate dizocilpine from saline. Dizocilpine (K(i ) approximately 0.003 muM) protected against NMDA-induced convulsions at doses that produced ataxia and stimulation of locomotor activity. Conversely, memantine (K(i ) approximately 0.54 muM) prevented convulsions at doses that were 8- to 18-fold lower than those producing ataxia or effects on locomotion, respectively. Indeed, in contrast to dizocilpine, memantine did not stimulate locomotor activity but only produced dose-dependent reductions. The low-affinity antagonists ibogaine (K(i ) approximately 1 muM) and ADCI (K(i ) approximately 11 muM) protected against convulsions at doses that produced significant dizocilpine-like discriminative stimulus effects, ataxia and decreases in locomotor activity. Amantadine (K(i ) approximately 11 muM) was ineffective against NMDA-induced convulsions up to doses that produced significant behavioral side effects. Conclusions: These findings indicate that only certain low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA antagonists (e.g., memantine) may have therapeutic efficacy at doses that do not produce an adverse side-effect profile. For other therapeutic endpoints, different estimates of efficacy and safety require derivation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext