SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nextwave Telecom Inc.
WAVE 7.425+0.1%Nov 19 3:43 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jon Koplik who wrote (202)12/4/1999 5:16:00 PM
From: JGoren  Read Replies (2) of 1088
 
The case would have been heard by a three-judge panel. They may not live in the same cities and therefore have offices in their home towns. Consequently, they may not office in the same building and be able to communicate as directly in finalizing an opinion that all three can agree on. In addition, there may be problems getting agreement on the language. And, there could be a delay because one of the judge's is preparing a separate concurring opinion or an opinion that dissents at least in part. Remember, they are trying to get the opinion out very quickly. Since there is a good chance that it may be appealed to the whole court en banc or to the Supreme Court of the United States, the opinion is more important than in most cases.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News