'Outdated'? Well-preserved a better adjective, perhaps - techstocks.com
Most of the posts are still there, and as long as Classic's outstanding structure survives, they can be easily retrieved. No, i submit that they are neither outdated nor 'out of context'. To explain very carefully;
1. On the fourth day of December in the Year of Our Lord 1999, you say -
"Since I sold OUT of Bre-x about $2 bucks from their ALLTIME high, and, yep, sold it all at that price..."
Message 12189635
2. On the fourth day of May in the Year of Our Lord 1997, you say -
"I still own BSR, BXM and BXO"
Message 1333197
3. On the second day of August in the Year of Our Lord 1997, you say -
"Since I sold 84% of my BXM:
at US$17.125, January 14, 1997," -
Message 1891746
Now if statement 1 is true, then statements 2 and 3 are untrue.
And vice versa, if statements 2 and 3 are true, then statement 1 is untrue.
My question is - which is it?
Never mind the 10-for-1 split, we're well aware of that, the trading history as well.
"GPGI" - Moi, a desert dirt aficionado? Never. Been a critic, actually.
Rose, you're getting your fans mixed up -g- ... good to see ya, though ... toodle-oo
|
