The only information you have on whether I'm up or down in this stock came from me, and you can check the chart yourself to see that, as is usual with stocks, any given investor could be either up or down with the equity. So you are in no position to contradict me, especially considering that you have no access to my financial records.
The point is, you demonstrate your lack of credibility over and over again -- even in areas that should be irrelevant to you.
As for your "immortal words," I simply clipped your own line from one of your posts back to you, which began "In the immortal words of Bill Wexler . . ." Perhaps you can show how that was out of context or was otherwise unfair. Did someone sneak it into your post while you stepped away from your keyboard to make you look like a bore and an egomaniac? If that were the case, I will apologize for implying your ego is WAY out of control, especially after you boasted to your board that your stock picks have nothing to do with your ego. Your posting here indicates your massive need for attention, even if simply negative attention. (Note to thread: Do me a favor, and stay off this guy's thread.)
I don't 'tout' this stock. I have gone on your thread to point out that you post recommendations providing no evidence of any due diligence in this stock. And so many others have done so in their stocks. In fact, you have stated several times how you only need a few minutes to come to a conclusion. (Sometimes I wonder why it takes you that long, since typing "stock fraud" only will occupy a few seconds.)
I'm not aware of a stock promotion fraud in relation to Identix, Wexler, so we have nothing to discuss. You complain about Westergaard's credibility; well, so have I, and others on this thread. He has no more influence over investors than you do, and neither of you is taken seriously . . . you are just amusements. |
