Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Petz who wrote (82082)	12/5/1999 11:18:00 AM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (5) of 1573678

Re: "If true, Intel has violated anti-trust law." Well Judge Petz, when did you hand down your ruling? To violate Anti-Trust Law you must have first established that Intel IS a monopoly, and then you could rule they violated the law. Your summary judgement was somehow missed by the press. You must also have established that AMD is not competitive and that will put you at odds with the majority on this thread. You can't have it both ways. If Intel is a monopoly then AMD isn't competitive. If AMD is competitive then there's no monopoly. I know McDonalds has an exclusive contract to sell only one Cola and for that they get a reduced price. No one screams anti-trust because there's competition in the cola wars. If you're going to claim monopoly then you admit AMD doesn't have a chance and you agree with me. EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next