Cat: My apologies, as I didn't mean to insinuate that your only form of d.d. was to listening to the yappings of Mr. Bill.
I'm sure you're good at the game you run, be it short, long, etc.. As am I. But I trust that you and others on this thread don't run amok on other threads, making accusatory statements supported by not one bit of data, as if the mere fact of making the statements provides sufficient authority to back your claim(s). Mr. Bill, however, seems to do this with remarkable frequency from what I've monitored. By any other name that tactic is hucksterism at its capitalistic ugliest.
Be that as it may, one needs to recognize that when one initiates such a tactic, he/she provides a fertile field for being attacked in kind. Hiding behind some sort of indignity, or refusal to respond, only makes a hypocrite out of same. But don't misconstrue; Cat, I wish you well with your profits as my ire isn't directed at you. And once again I must reiterate to Mr. Bill:
MY CHALLENGE TO MR. BILL STILL STANDS. SHOW SOME PROOF FOR ALL YOU CLAIM. NOTE: THIS IS NOW THE TENTH TIME I HAVE ISSUED THIS CHALLENGE.
He, of course, will not respond, thus validating my above commentary. So it goes out here in cyberspace.
Once again. My apologies to you. Have a nice holiday!
John~ |
