It [i.e. rape] comes with the territory.
You must really work hard to come up with rationales and justifications for Clinton's behavior. You are a gold medalist in goading people but an also-ran when it comes to logic. However, surely you can do better than this. Rape is all part and parcel of being a politician -- so therefore, Clinton didn't do anything wrong with Juanita Broadrick? So, why run Packwood out of town? He didn't rape -- only groped and kissed. And, heck, Clarence Thomas -- by agreement of accuser and accused ("J'accuse"???) didn't even touch anyone -- but nearly lost his career.
think T.nugent has ever "forced himself" on a Female?
1. Don't know.
2. Don't care.
3. Last I checked, he was a washed-up gonzo rocker/hunting activist -- not the alleged leader of the free world sworn to uphold and defend the laws of the country. Maybe -- *maybe* -- you can see the difference. Oh, heck, what am I saying!
4. So, whatever a gonzo rocker does should set the bar for the bahavior of the country's chief executive. Interesting theory. Could you find three (non-stoned, non-drunk, non-high) voting-age adults in the country to agree with that?
Now, in response, please make sure you post some type of non-sequitir definition that surely must be some type of coded message to your mothership...
(HEY, here's an idea: post the definition to "non-sequitir"! -- Boy! That'd be daffy and funny all at once...) |
