SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Frank Coluccio Technology Forum - ASAP

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jay Lowe who wrote (668)12/6/1999 7:55:00 PM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Read Replies (2) of 1782
 
Anyone; how can an inaccurate router table cause 8 hours of down time for AT&TWorldNet if it was infact, a shared ISP?

Since IP addresses are shared among ISPs, and databases storing those addresses have to be continually updated to ensure service, why would a "shared ISP" affect AT&T, and how often do the addresses need to be updated?

I would think that AT&T had total control over their IP address and links, or is this an individual ISP problem and AT&T was singled out?

Did this mean that the problem-router with a shared ISP was just that, shared and not controlled in any fashion by AT&T?

So one could say that any ISP running off AT&TWorldNet could in fact mishandle a router function and cause considerable down time, not only to the local ISP, but to the entire AT&T program?

If it take more than a few sentences here, that's ok, no biggie.....

Just a bit confused here.

techweb.com

temp'
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext