SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VISX

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MGV who wrote (1405)12/7/1999 12:54:00 AM
From: W Shakespeare  Read Replies (3) of 1754
 
In point of fact, the Nidek verdict is completely irrelevant to BOL's and LASE's legal standing versus VISX. VISX cannot sue American companies through the International
Trade Commission. The verdict is irrelevant to any legal threat that VISX poses to other American manufacturers of lasers.
What is relevant to the ongoing negotiations is how many lawsuits that VISX is willing to pursue at once. If VISX had won a decisive victory against NIDEK, it could then turn its legal guns toward any other competitor who dared to challenge its patents. Now its must continue to attack NIDEK through other, much slower, legal venues. However, I believe that VISX will legally attack any company that challenges its patents. The costs could be a significant drag on earnings if they were to go to full scale war against both BOL and LASE while still pursuing NIDEK.
I still believe that both BOL and LASE will negotiate some sort of license agreement. However, I think the terms may not be as favorable to VISX as some have ventured.
In terms of the timing of any agreements, I think both BOL and LASE are planning to roll out their new lasers before 3/6/2000. Will they wait and lose sales or will they fight and face legal costs and the uncertainty of the legal outcome?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext