SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ballard Power -world leader zero-emission PEM fuel cells
BLDP 2.160-0.9%Feb 10 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (645)4/18/1997 3:44:00 PM
From: Garth Richmond   of 5827
 
Sid,

Glad we agree on point#1 (Ballard's excellent management)

Point#2: you're missing the point. Without the D-B deal,
or something similar, Ballard would be footing the bill
for all fuel cell production themselves, i.e. revenue=ZIP,
cost=LOTS. "breakeven or tiny margins" is great. It sure
beats zero!

Point#3: Outsourcing is becoming more and more common,
esp. for new technologies, where it is clearly cheaper
for a company to leverage someone elses technology,
rather than pay for years of their own R&D. It also
allows the other co. to bring its product to market that
much faster. I expect there will be alternative technologies
as well, but if PEM turns out to be the technology of choice,
as I believe, it will be better for other co's to buy the
engines from the JV co. Pure economics - it is the cheaper
solution. Ballard's excellent management also knows the
dangers of having only one partner, so don't be surprised
if/when the other JV's with GM, etc. continue to grow.

So on this point we disagree. OK.

I do agree that this will bring other "green" technologies
more into focus, and is a boon for ERC and others like them.

Point#4: Your "suspicious coincidence" theory...I don't buy
it. The 2 co's agreed that D-B would buy 25% of Ballard, for
$35/share, and then had to set a value for the stack tech.
assets, facilities, personnel, etc., which they subtracted
from the price. Don't tell me that just because it worked
out to about $10/share, that it is somehow suspect, just
because the numbers are even. You've been watching too much
X-files.

You keep saying $25, so I can only conclude that you value
the stack tech. assets, facilities, personnel, etc. at $0.
Here too, we disagree.

Regarding Ballard's price, you say $25 is "a lot more than
the stock is worth." Well, that is your opinion, but it is not
shared by Daimler-Benz, or by Midland-Walwyn and Nesbitt-Burns
(the 2 highest ranked research depts. in Canada). That doesn't
make you wrong, but you are up against some extremely astute
market analysts. (My own opinion of Ballard was formed
independent of M-W, N-B, or any other analysts.)

Garth.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext