Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (82347)	12/8/1999 12:42:00 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (2) of 1579120

Bill, Re:"elmer" You will notice that Elmer will IGNORE the facts regarding the Intel data sheets which also vilate the P=IV equation. You will notice that Elmer will IGNORE the facts regarding his own FUD. First he said that folks use a "wave meter" to test power taking 500ms. Then he changed it to a dynamic IDD test calibrated to a known database. Then he denied the need for a database. You will notice that Elmer has claimed to be a test engineer for microprocessor chips. Yet he cannot get beyond P=IV as the equation. As I am sure you know a first order model for a transistor is a resistor and a switch. When the switch is closed the resistor takes Icc max. When the switch is open it takes Zero current. On the one hand he claims that the power consumed is = Max ICC times max VCC. When he MUST know that an average current must be measured dynamically to emulate real world worst case switching. In fact he states this is subsequent posts IN DIRECT VIOLATION of his equation P=IV. He clearly has an AGENDA to post FUD on this. The reason I am POed is he knows better than to keep posting this CRAP about P=Imax x Vmax. regards, Kash

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next