A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (2158)	12/9/1999 8:21:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) of 3246

>>but there is no solid evidence Wrong. There is plenty of solid evidence. The evidence abounds and grows with new revelations. Certainly we know much more now than in 1945. >>You are engaged in circular reasoning. More likely that is true of you. Your standard of proof is illusory given the environment. You demand direct evidence of perfidy but then rely on FDR, his minions or the government to willingly supply it. Not very likely. But because the large and growing evidence against FDR is categorized as "circumstantial", it is discounted by those who do not understand that circumstantial evidence is the most reliable evidence. Ask an "evidence man".

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next