Bill Wexler's Dog Pound Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound

REFR 1.730

+10.2%

3:57 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (5434)	12/10/1999 1:05:00 PM
From: golden_tee	Read Replies (2) of 10293

wexler, did you even read the article? If I didn't know better, I'd say that the article is BULLISH! Quote from the 'article': "For years it supposedly was going to come up with a hot new battery technology. I pounded on Valence day after day, back when it was based in the Bay Area and I was with the San Francisco Chronicle. (I hit it so much, I guess, that the company moved to that hot technology haven of Henderson, Nev.) THIS TIME, I AM TOLD, SOME VERY SMART PEOPLE BELIEVE THE COMPANY REALLY DOES HAVE SOMETHING THAT WILL BE A BIG-TIME SUCCESS. I say treat it like you'd treat a supposedly hot drug in Phase 3 clinical trials. Too many of those turn out to be disasters." I take it that these very smart people are also in on the scam? Greenberg has been anti-VLNC for years. He, like you, lets hatred for a stock dictate your investing. As to your recommendation to reshort based on another's article... further proof that you DO NOT do any research. Anyone who would take your recommendation to short VLNC at these levels deserves what is coming to them. P.S. GUMM is rocking, are you stopped out of it too yet?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next