SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stan J. Czernel who wrote (13006)12/12/1999 10:37:00 AM
From: JSBRead Replies (1) of 118717
 
Stan, there is a world of difference between
tagatose and all the other sugar subsitutes, it's
those difference which give BINC somewhat of an
unlimited potential.

Firstly, tagatose is a full bulk substitue,
whereby it can be used in exactly the same
proportions as sugar in any and all recipes.

Secondly, it has absolutely no aftertaste and
tastes exactly like sugar.

Thirdly, it is naturally occuring in nature
and is derived from whey, a milk byproduct.

Additionally, it is actually a benefit to
diabetics and is said to be an appetite
suppresant.

If you consider the value of say a Hersheys
or a Kelloggs using tagatose the amount of
the contracts would be huge.

Lastly, while MDFI owns the license to
put tag in foods, BINC still owns the rights
for any medicinal uses.

I would not be surprised to see it used in candy,
ice cream, diet soft drinks and much more.

The bottom line is that once it's totally approved
and production ramped, BINC is easily looking
at something like 8 bucks a share or more in
revenues and no expenses. For the sake of
discussion, let's say BINC has 5 bucks a year
in revs starting in maybe the second or third
year of production, given a PE of maybe 9 or 10
and still growing, you can see the future of BINC.

J
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext