SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Frank Coluccio Technology Forum - ASAP

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (704)12/12/1999 11:36:00 PM
From: George Dawson  Read Replies (1) of 1782
 
Frank,

Very good review of home networks or as the authors refer to it "the last 100 yards" in this month's IEEE Spectrum.

The article also includes projections for households with structured wiring in the U.S. as well as the breakdown by medium (powerline, wireless, phone line). The projected increase in structured wiring goes from 50K in 1999 to 800K in 2003. Phone line dominates in this space 87% in 2000 to 70% in 2003. The percentage points lost are gained by wireless. The structured wiring has been pushed heavily by some tech companies and IBM was mentioned. In that approach all the lines (cat 5, phone lines, power lines, and RG-6 coaxial cable) all come in through the same point. IBM has a Home Director product that would manage devices on the network. Upstream from this director would be a broadband gateway to the internet containing the necessary modems or transceiver devices.

The article also contains specifics about companies and proprietary technologies competing in this space. For example, Tut Systems (Pleasant Hill, CA) has a system for frequency division multiplexing on phone lines. Their system creates three channels for phone service, ASDL, and entertainment and more high speed data.

Overall, a very interesting article worth reading.

George D.

Ref: Dutta-Roy A. Networks for homes. Spectrum 1999; 36:26-33.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext