SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc
ATHM 23.48+1.2%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (17900)12/13/1999 1:10:00 PM
From: ahhaha  Read Replies (2) of 29970
 
Now let's change the names. Att is delivering data through the ATHM face in a telephony area which is dominated by SBC. Att would like to compete in that local area for voice and SBC would like to compete in data and retain what could be grabbed by Att through cable if SBC has no presence in that "space". SBC goes to ATHM and says, "we'd like you to take our 'bone feed and tap in at your RDC or take our physical 'bone to Att's head end in order to supply BB:telephony and Internet. Att can't object since Att wants SBC to open up the local market, but at the same time the RDC tap opens SBC's local market since Att would then be able to uplink into the local area's circuit switched telephony through the tap. Is this coherent and can SBC legally block the uplink through the tap?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News