Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Charles R who wrote (82807)	12/13/1999 4:21:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) of 1571297

Chuck, <x86-64 will be way ahead of IA-64 in sheer number of applications available at launch by an order of magnitude.> Come on, Chuck, if you're going to do any comparison, make it an apples-to-apples one. Itanium can run IA-32 code, and in fact, IA-32 compatibility is considered very important even for IA-64. The performance of Itanium on IA-32 code may not be stellar, but at least it works. (It may even be equivalent to Xeon; I don't know.) Your comparison, however, assumes that IA-32 apps shouldn't be considered "available" from an IA-64 perspective, which is absolutely false. <IA-64 to Intel is somewhat like Microchannel to IBM.> Funny, I thought a certain DRAM technology that Intel was pushing was considered their Microchannel. ;-\| In any case, the analogies to Microchannel is one of the favorite standby arguments of anti-Intel people. AGP was Microchannel. Slot 1 was Microchannel. Slot 2 was Microchannel. RDRAM is now Microchannel. And now IA-64 will be Microchannel. Doesn't it get old after two or three years? Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next