BRE-X, Indonesia, Ashanti Goldfields, Strong Companies. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : BRE-X, Indonesia, Ashanti Goldfields, Strong Companies.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dennis Martin who wrote (15357)	4/19/1997 8:41:00 PM
From: Jesse	of 28369

Informative post, Dennis! I don't think, however, that Bre-X desired to release the Strathcona statement, but had to as a result of the Freeport leak and pr.release. Their only option at that point was to turn their data over to an impartial panel/expert, and that jury in turn gave its impression. I believe the Strathcona missive was purported because they saw the flaw in BXM's methodology: i.e., the induplicable tests (a must for any scientific process to be considered valid). The announced assessment, then, was that there was a POSSIBILITY (strong or whatever), that the results may have been over-extrapolated to the remainder of the area by Felderhof, et al. (also partly because SNC Lavalin's report was based on BXM-supplied samples). For now, I don't feel that any legitimate conclusions can be based on this part of the problem, at least until confirmatory drilling and proper assaying is conducted, and then RE-confirmed again, like any reliable scientific proof. You raise some very good and valid points to consider, as well as supply pertinent info - -thanx! Best of, JJ

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next