O/T FGH & Sarge; take a deep breath....
SargeK; re: FGH
...You are standing in an empty threatre and yelling fire.
Get a clue; I made some tongue in cheek comments about your "zealousness" for FGH and the over the top nature of what appears to be a near "obsession" in my most humble opinion.
But; that is all fine - that is your right to do. You do not see me calling you SPAM MAN, or HYPESTER etc - even thought your FGH posts have exceeded anything many have done on a single stock. That's your perogative.
Now this cut & paste monologue you carry on with yourself from Yahoo to SI and back & forth, I really don't get ? But, no big deal...
Sarge; I will not mention FGH again,in any way untill I trade in either long, or short and that won't be anytime soon. Not a mention - because, I honestly could care less what this company does; I guess you would say I am neutral on FGH, not overly bearish, nor overly bullish - but, maybe with a bullish bias - there, happy ?
If I, or anyone with a clue to life; were to short anything; it sure as hell would not be FGH. The no-brainer would be the iNet & Tech stocks that are at insane valuations and especially the recent smaller cap issues that have went through the roof with no prior support. Not the Cisco's of the world, why bother - it's the "pretend" companies like those talked about on the SI Anthony@Pacific thread that are the list of shorts. FGH would not be on ANYONE's short list in THIS market. That also drives home my point that I made long ago and still believe, that in my "opinion" those shorts are not "trading" shorts; but "hedging" shorts for a major long & longterm holding. That FGH's short interest hasn't disappeared here at $7 tells the world that these shorts are NOT hedge funds, or mere traders looking to make a nice profit. If it were, they would have covered and left with a damn HOME RUN SHORT COVER ! - looking for easier prey with 5 times the risk vs. reward downside than FGH - and that list in nearly infinite in this NASDQ mania...
Also, no one is "attacking" you, or targeting you. As I said earlier; you have been quite an internet personality for a number of years... Cityscape et al. I merely was tweaking your rather large ego here about past "obsessions" that is all. Sarge, my posts to Yahoo were only in response and only AFTER one of your posts that "slider" is manipulating FGH etc... every screen name that doesn't agree with you is slider, slider, slider - he's everywhere; simultaneously on 137 threads - all the shorts, all the people on the entire Internet who disagree with you are all me ? - you're coming off as a bit of a `loon her Sarge...
end of story; sincerely - good luck & I honestly do not have FGH on my radar screen - long, or short. Perhaps late in 2000 I will start looking to companies in subsectors of the oilpatch who generally will come into their sweetspot a bit later and who will start to get the ususal increase in orders due to the nature of their later cyle peak. No biggie... hope it hits $40 tomorrow - really.
Find another shadow to fight - it aint me. What worries me personally in a serious manner; is that you really think that some group of mysterious people are setting in some room somewhere targeting "YOU" ? - the defender of all good & righteous with FGH ? Trust me Sarge, no offense, neither "you" nor, FGH are of any interest to anyone who would choose to do this... don't over self-aggrandize yourself, or FGH for that matter. There are about 1500 stocks that are both better short term "long" upside prospects (the case that people want to drive the price down to steal it - hell, only JL had that motive of late by the damn way !!!) and also better short term "short" prospects (ie: no one would waste their time, or money playing FGH short "here" after the game is over with all the sitting ducks in NASDQ land). ... aint no boogeymen after you, or FGH.
end of subject; now back to business ?
PS in you follow up post you said:
<<However, the thing I abhor about short sellers are the countless unconfirmed rumors, hype and other destructive (often vulgar) tactics they employ in their obvious, amateurish attempts to disrupt a message board and smear their targets (company or other posters). It is rare to see a short seller post a link to support or confirm their frivolous claims. >>
... now where in ANY of my recent posts have I said anything "unconfirmed, hyped, destructive, vulgar, of what message board did I distrupt in reagards to fGH ?
Sarge - honestly, you are either trying to greatly exaggerate your own self importance and have taken on some type of defender-identity for FGH and are coming off as a total mental case here fwiw. My "commentary" on FGH was months ago - old news; again - I could give a rats ass what FGH does today, tomorrow, or months from now ?
... again, maybe you are a genius; this is some type of "double-negative" hype awarness for FGH ? Hell, YOU are the professional Military Intelligence Man , not me ? or, as I said earlier - again, ingenious new form of internet "Green-Mail" - as if I was JL, I would definitely pay you big bucks in a cease & desist agreement to never mention my company, or my name in one of your posts.ROFLMAO~ |
