Office Product Stocks - ODP/SPLS/OMX/VKNG/CEXP/OFIS/BOP Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Office Product Stocks - ODP/SPLS/OMX/VKNG/CEXP/OFIS/BOP

SPLS 10.25

0.0%

Sep 28 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Candle stick who wrote (23)	4/20/1997 2:24:00 PM
From: AL TOTH	of 297

DIPSTICK-Several points to ponder: 1.You are the one who attacked me first by calling me a buffoon. Since you seem to comment so much on what is appropiate behavior for SI posts, I would assume that appropriate behavior would be that if you disagreed with someones opinion you either reply and state your point or you dont say anything. Calling someone a buffoon and a liar,accusing them of being something they are not-a short stock hypster-are totally unprofessional behavior. And to be honest with you I wont personally take it. I will take you on until you finally realize your are out of your league. Because if you feel you can get away berating people on SI who are only expressing their own opinion you will continue to do it. 2.I am not short OFIS nor have I ever been. However I gave you plenty of good explanations why OFIS will not even maintain its present P/E. All you can come back to me with is their P/E is 27 not 100 (which was a typo on my part) and an article in barrons that is mainly hype from their CEO Ledecky. If you dont like hypsters, then you should hate Ledecky. This guy is constantly hyping his stock. Havent you noticed that the stocks that get eventually smashed are usually ones where the CEO has extrordinarily hyped his stock. 3.You are looking at statistics and news articles to debate me,but you dont know the guts of this stock. I lost $500,000 in 1995 because I believed an article in Barrons where Jeff Vinik said MU was a great stock. And if you dont believe me (since you are the big talker on research) than check the lawsuit against Vinik and Fidelity in US District Court in Boston and you will see my claim for the above amount. Barrons is one of the worst sources of stock research because all they do is write what people want them to say to hype their own stocks. So once again if you want to debate the true guts of OFIS I am waiting but calling me a liar and a mail room clerk only shows me youve got nothing of any substance to say which makes you a hell of alot more useless to the SI forum than me. IM WAITING AL

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next