The New Corporate Vision Inc. ( CVIA ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : The New Corporate Vision Inc. ( CVIA )

CVIA 0.480

0.0%

Jun 30 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John B who wrote (3263)	12/16/1999 11:51:00 PM
From: The Devil Dog	Read Replies (2) of 3596

Good Evening John I came on board just after the split, I came on board because I liked what I saw with Keith taking control of a bad situation. I never owned shares prior to the split. I had sense see that keith was the man for the job and plunked down my hard earned cash. Been busy huh? Wayne, I have a question for you, When CVIA went through the 300-1 reverse split, were you one of those that cut and run--sold out? Or were you one of the few, such as myself, that stood up and fought back for what was right? Why this question, do you doubt my integrity or my motivations? Allow me to make one thing clear, All I was trying to do was make it perfectly clear as to all ones options including GTC orders. Calling for certs achieves numerous things, forces MM to cover, achieves prompt notification in the event of a proxy vote where as shares held in the name of the street so as not to incur delays in the event immediate notification is necessary. One final point. I am long , long term and have no problem calling for certs. However not all have the luxury of that option so I was just filling in some of the blanks that were asked BY OTHERS, and am in no way recommending any particular type of action. Each individual must decide what the right action is for them. I do not offer any type of financial advice. Keith made the point of suggesting calling for certs for the sole purpose in the event of an unexpected proxy vote that the full participation of the long shareholders which control the majority of the stock could actively participate insuring an accurate representation of the shareholders wishes. Keith, please correct me if I am wrong. Best Regards WB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next