SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BGR who wrote (71997)12/17/1999 8:50:00 AM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (2) of 132070
 
BGR,

>>Of course, then the ones who sold the puts would have made the reverse argument (why not hurry it by 2 minutes?). The Fed is in a lose-lose situation it seems.<<

The key to this whole discussion is who the two parties were and the timing of the cut.

One was Wall St. and its bankers and one was the general public.

Being "proactive" to protect Wall St. is the problem. The world would not have ended if he waited one day. That's the point you are missing. It's not who won and who lost. It's who had help winning and the timing of that help.

Can you imagine him doing the same thing in reverse? Imagine Wall St sitting on piles of winnings and the public buried and he shockingly raises interest rates with a few minutes to go and screws THE ST.

Yea right that will happen. These days he tells them weeks in advance when the rate increases are coming.

Wayne
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext