SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pae who wrote (9701)12/17/1999 3:13:00 PM
From: Spots  Read Replies (1) of 14778
 
Naw, there's no restriction on DHCP through an uplink. What
you get through an uplink is a weaker signal in many
el-cheapo hubs. Linksys in particular forbids two
cascading uplinks on their "at home" class hubs. Still,
it should have worked I'd think. It worked with my
linksys hub, though I finally deep-sixed the hub in
favor of a full-duplex switch (I told you I was a LAN
speed junkie <GG>).

I don't know how long your cables are--sounds like you've
got everything close together--but this is the only guess
I've got.

Anyhow, good you got it going. I'd still consider static
IP addresses if I were you. All in all, static addresses
are less trouble when you have close control over the
whole network. Says the man who never configured DHCP in
his life <G> (and with any luck will keep it that way,
I might add <GGG>).

Incidentally, if your r9100 falls on the slippery tile so
it can't issue addresses, static addresses will make it
easier to route to a dial IP backup.

Spots
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext