RE: "Since there were no serious replies to my previous post, is it because"
Deibutfeif, I'll add a few items to your list...
5) RE: "Paul"
You asked Paul, not the thread
6) RE: "based on the ramp-down of employee stock option runrates"
This comment assumes we know what you are talking about. I have no clue what you are talking about. I do not know what "runrates" are. However, if this is inside information - please do not reply.
7) RE: "Possible factors - reduced payroll costs, blip-up in stock dilution rate due to options being exercised, loss of experienced personnel"
I have no clue what you are talking about. If this is about the industry issue which is generic to all companies, i.e. "loss of personnel due to vesting" of stock options, well nearly every high-tech company has this issue to deal with. What's new? I really don't know what you mean when you refer to reduced payroll costs since Intel is growing.
8) RE: "Actually, as one of those likely to split on one of these Aprils"
The purpose of that piece of information isn't clear. Also, I rather doubt it's a good idea for an inside employee to predict the potential split of their company's stock, if this is what you were doing.
9) RE: "INTC represents approx 125% of networth"
This statement doesn't make sense to me.
10) RE: "its a serious question"
A serious question requires more articulation. What exactly is your question and the framework for the question? It's hard to help, when it's not clear.
Regards,
Amy J |
