SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (72056)12/18/1999 10:31:00 AM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (2) of 132070
 
MB, re: The " New Era"
It seem's the phenomena is constrained to a small percentage of stocks, (mostly hi- tech), that have outrageous P/E's and Mkt Cap's.
According to a recent article in "Money", the stocks tracked by Value Line have a median P/E under 15, and the average Blue Chip in the SP500 is below 30. It also shows a chart where 60% of all stocks are lagging the SP500 this year.
I ran a "screen" on the Nasdaq site, (NYSE and Nasdaq), that shows there are 36 companies with a Cap >$100B, ($7Trillion+ total Cap for the 36 with an average of $196B). (I think there may be some anomalies in the screen, but I have to go with it). What percent of total mkt cap does this $7 Trillion equate to?
If you look at the "bubble" as being constrained to a small percentage of stocks, are there parallels to the bubbles of the past? (For example, '29 and Japan?) Were they this narrow?
(And do you look at the bubble as being constrained in this manner?)
When the BK hit's, (which all you guys have convinced me is only a matter of time), will it have broad implications, or be constrained to a small percentage of stocks?
TIA
Gene
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext