SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla Game Investing in the eWorld

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Teflon who wrote ()12/19/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: quartersawyer   of 1817
 
M-commerce (mobile e-commerce) security standards are in a critical formative stage. There is the PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) Forum, including IBM, Microsoft and RSA Security. There is Radicchio ( EDS; Ericsson, Gemplus- a France based smartcard mfg, Sonera- a Finnish telecom providing infrastructure technology to the Radicchio group)which claims to have concern that WAP devices have been pushed to market ahead of vital security issues, potentially stunting or delaying growth. Certicom, the cryptography company from which Q and others recently bought licenses, just joined Radicchio, which currently proposes a standard utilizing the 1024 bit assymmetric RSA code from RSA Security, but given Certicom's competitive position, we're looking at anything but convergence. There's an informative white paper at the Certicom site here:
certicom.com

There may be more groups squaring off, and technically I'm in the dark (as usual) except for that white paper, but RSAS/CIC is reminiscent of ERICY/QCOM. RSA's patents are expiring soon, which makes it somewhat more complex, i.e. the RSA code will be free for dvelopers from, say IBM and M-soft to work with, while the CIC code is superior but bears royalties to the owner. My sense is that Certicom's code will be the standard, but I can't factor out the value of the royalties, and my experience with Q has perhaps become an engram, skewing my thinking. In any event it seems undesirable and unlikely that we'll get into multiple modes of the standard since the market is still undeveloped and there's everything to be gained from a pure interoperation of all encrypted wireless devices, but there's heat being generated in this area. And I don't understand the generic difficulties with WAP:

The group denies Radicchio is a slap in the face for the WAP (wireless application protocol) Forum, or other existing forums, such as Bluetooth, which is advancing wireless connectivity for mobile devices.

"There are too many other issues to be resolved in the WAP Forum [which don't relate to security]," Sonera's Krull added.
radicchio.org

Does anyone have any depth in this?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext