Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (83648)	12/20/1999 11:55:00 AM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (3) of 1572580

Hi Wally: I'd take with a grain of salt the relentless some-time-in-the-future promises from Intel, particularly coming on the heels of the failure to meet promises witnessed over the past 3 months... If indeed Intel is able to provide the promised few processors in the short term, there is little reason to believe that any system that "these promised few" show up in will be more expensive than any comparative system running on the "spry Athy" of the same MHz. The false responses by Intel to the 700 and 750 Athlons have cost INTC dearly, not only in incremental cost to produce, but more importantly in consumer perception of the PweeIII. Gonna be real tough for INTC to shake its new image with the consumer which seems to be leaving "Intel outside". Have to say it again: The Athlon is the "better mousetrap at the better price". The PWeeIII has had its day in the sun! Wonder just how much more incremental production cost INTC is willing to eat in attempts to polish its badly tarnished PWeeIII image and how many false starts before they bring any meaningful production to market exceeding 733 MHz?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next