Investing for the January Effect 2000 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Investing for the January Effect 2000

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Q. who wrote (17)	12/20/1999 12:14:00 PM
From: Q.	Read Replies (1) of 109

Here's the data from MarketGuide: INSTITUTIONAL & INSIDER OWNERSHIP PURCHASES SALES NET PURCH %OWNED Institutions (3 Months) 2.761 Mil 5.653 Mil -2.892 Mil 69.6% Insiders (6 Months) 0.004 Mil 0.000 Mil 0.004 Mil 38.3% Note that institutional + insider ownership is > 100% according to MarketGuide. This is not uncommon in the MG data, due to double counting some shareholders in both categories or due to overcounting insider ownership data in the proxy. Anyway, it is clear that EBSC doesn't seem to have a lot of ownership by small investors. Here's the corresponding data for SVM, which appears to have a lot more shares in small hands: INSTITUTIONAL & INSIDER OWNERSHIP PURCHASES SALES NET PURCH %OWNED Institutions (3 Months) 25.422 Mil 25.049 Mil 0.373 Mil 40.2% Insiders (6 Months) 0.100 Mil 0.000 Mil 0.100 Mil 14.0%

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next