SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Global Crossing - GX (formerly GBLX)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DOUG H who wrote (3728)12/22/1999 3:41:00 PM
From: quidditch  Read Replies (2) of 15615
 
Hi Doug:

Sorry for the delay. NXTL couldn't "cure the default" as such, but if a plan of reorganization were presented by the d.i.p. (Nextwave) that, by including NXTL's funds (and NXTL ownership down the line of Nextwave) or, for that matter, GBLX funds, satisfies enough of the creditors' claims, then the plan can be approved, and it is left to the parties to work out their relationships in the context of the court-approved plan of reorganization. There are two issues here that I still don't see how they can be resolved under present law: i) how NXTL could walk off with Nextwave's spectrum, either alone or as an equity owner of Nextwave, when NXTL could not, I believe, have bid in the original C-bloc (my alphabet may be wrong here)spectrum auctions and ii) how NXTL can make a hostile tender offer for a d.i.p. when there is no trading of any Nextwave stock--if, in fact, Nextwave was public when it entered Ch. 11 (which I guess it was), since the ownership rights of the previous equity holders will not be determined until the plan is approved. A rather large Catch 22.

I agree with you on the point that, at this juncture, I don't see how the FCC can alter the amount of its claim--which is a fixed amount.

Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext