SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lorrie coey who wrote (64010)12/23/1999 11:04:00 AM
From: Scarecrow  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
1)personal attack
There was no personal attack in that post. There was one statement that involved you ("LC is practitioner of the bold art of the "Big Lie".") And frankly, that's neither attack nor opinion. It's a fact.

2. slanderous -- You don't know what you're talking about. Since you're the one who loves dictionaries, try looking up the word. You'll find that there's no such thing as written slander -- it's impossible. Slander must be spoken. Perhaps you meant "libelous." But libel requires provable damage to reputation. On this thread, given your venomous posts, is it even possible for another poster to damage your reputation further?

3) Third Party -- If you're worried that someone may be talking about you to someone else on this thread, that's legitimate. The solution: stop posting. You're really great at dishing it out, but you can't take it at all, can you?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News