SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BGR who wrote (72283)12/23/1999 2:31:00 PM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (2) of 132070
 
BGR,

>>If the Fed didn't make three hasty rate cuts, there would perhaps be a lot of former middle-class US citizens as well.
So, the policy error, perhaps, was post the 1997 crash when it came to the S.E. Asian economies. The Fed needs to be applauded for its fine performance.<<

>>(which averted a post 87 depression as well as handled the S&L crisis pretty well)<<

You fail to appreciate the "chicken and the egg" aspect to this. Without prior easy credit (fiat) we would not have had those excesses to begin with.

If you give a heroine addict a fix and make him feel better for a while are you really helping him?

He will need another fix (and perhaps a bigger one) down the line.

Of course "cold turkey" is difficult. But the idea is to avoid the excesses to begin with and not have to inject the heroine as a fix. That this Fed has been in almost regular bailout mode since 87 is saying something even if a meltdown has been averted so far. (87, 90s banking, Mexico, Asia, US capital markets) Each crisis has been met by the flood of paper and taxpayer bailout.

No one has said that the pre Federal Reserve system with its partial hard money standard was correct or good. But the Fed was/is a bandaid on a poor system that remains poor.

Wayne
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext