Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (64033)	12/27/1999 12:17:00 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) of 67261

<< There is no way to know if favors were traded without establishing that the affair took place,>>Sorry but my contention is that the issues of favoritism was trumped up to promote this line of questioning.Jones complaint was one of harassment. This could have easily been investigated without venturing into a private and personal affair. Was she in any way harassed for the alleged incident? It was her obligation to show how. < it is silly to argue that a principle that he agreed with becomes inapplicable when applied to him>> I do not believe that the law was meant to allow this degree fishing. It should not be inapplicable when applied to anyone in this manner..

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next